States Are Removing Fluoride From the Water. Here’s What You Need to Know

Published on The Good Men Project

In recent years, the conversation around fluoride in drinking water has taken a sharp turn. While fluoride has long been added to public water supplies for its benefits in preventing tooth decay, an increasing number of states in the U.S. are now deciding to remove it from their water systems. This shift has sparked debates on public health, safety, and individual choice. If you’ve been wondering why this is happening and what it means for you, here’s what you need to know about the fluoride removal movement.

What Is Fluoride and Why Has It Been Added to Water?

Fluoride is a naturally occurring mineral found in soil, water, and various foods. Since the mid-20th century, many municipalities have been adding fluoride to public drinking water as a measure to combat tooth decay—a widespread dental health issue.

The Benefits of Fluoride in Water Include:

• Significant reduction in cavities especially among children
• Cost-effective public health measure that lowers dental treatment expenses
• Strengthens tooth enamel, making it resistant to acid attacks from plaque bacteria

Why Are States Removing Fluoride from Public Water?

Despite these benefits, a growing number of states and communities are removing fluoride from their water supplies. The reasons behind this trend generally fall into a few categories:

1. Concerns Over Health Risks

Some critics point to potential health risks associated with fluoride, such as dental fluorosis (a discoloration of teeth), possible links to bone issues, or neurological concerns related to high fluoride exposure. Though scientific consensus holds that fluoride levels regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are safe, skeptics argue that no amount of fluoride in water should be universal due to differences in individual health sensitivities.

2. Growing Movement for Water Autonomy

Some advocates believe that adding fluoride to communal water supplies removes individual freedom to decide what substances they consume. They argue this choice should be left to personal health care decisions rather than government mandates.

3. Increasing Availability of Alternative Fluoride Sources

With topical fluoride found in toothpaste, mouth rinses, and dental treatments, some states question the necessity of systemic exposure through water, opting instead for individual application where needed.

States Leading the Fluoride Removal Movement

Several U.S. states and municipalities have taken steps to halt water fluoridation or are areas actively debating the topic. Below is a snapshot of recent state-level actions:

Benefits of Removing Fluoride from Water (What Supporters Say)

• Reduced risk of dental fluorosis: Especially important for children under 8 years old.
• Elimination of potential health risks: Though controversial, supporters argue removal protects vulnerable populations.
• Respect for personal choice and consent: Allows individuals to decide fluoride consumption independently.

Concerns About Fluoride Removal

Public health officials warn that removing fluoride from water could have unintended consequences including:

• Increase in dental cavities, particularly in low-income communities with limited dental care access
• Exacerbation of oral health disparities
• Additional healthcare costs related to preventable tooth decay

Practical Tips for Individuals in Areas Without Fluoride

If your state or city is removing fluoride from public water, here are some practical recommendations to protect your and your family’s dental health:

• Use fluoride toothpaste and mouth rinses: These topical applications continue to provide cavity protection.
• Maintain regular dental checkups: Professional cleanings and fluoride treatments are critical.
• Monitor children’s fluoride intake: Use fluoride supplements only under a dentist’s advice.
• Consume a balanced diet rich in calcium and vitamin D: Essential for strong teeth and bones.

Firsthand Experiences: Voices from Communities

In communities like Portland, Oregon, where fluoride was recently removed, residents have had mixed reactions:

“I worry about my kids not getting enough fluoride, but I also wanted the option to avoid chemicals in our water,” said a local mother.

“Removing fluoride is like taking a step back on public health,” said a dental hygienist in the city.

These differing viewpoints highlight the complexity of balancing individual freedom with public health priorities.

Fluoride in Water: The Science Behind Safety and Effectiveness

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has hailed water fluoridation as one of the 10 great public health achievements of the 20th century. Multiple studies support that maintaining fluoride levels between 0.7 and 1.2 mg/L in water is both safe and effective for cavity prevention.

Nonetheless, ongoing research continues to examine long-term effects and efficacy alongside public sentiment and policy shifts.

Summary Table: Fluoride Pros and Cons

Conclusion: Navigating the Fluoride Debate in Your Community

The removal of fluoride from water systems reflects a broader societal reevaluation of public health interventions and individual rights. While science continues to support the safety and benefits of fluoridation, community values and personal choice are shaping new directions in water treatment policies.

Whether fluoride stays or goes in your local water, staying informed and proactive about your dental health is key. Use trusted dental products, maintain routine dental care, and participate in local health discussions to ensure your voice is heard.

As states continue to decide on fluoride policies, understanding both sides of the debate will empower you to make the best choices for yourself and your family’s well-being.